Prosecutions for May 2015

Number Latest Month 11,471
Percent Change from previous month -9.3
Percent Change from 1 year ago -4.3
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -15.5
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -25.6
Table 1. Criminal Prosecutions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during May 2015 the government reported 11471 new prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 9.3 percent over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants charged are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).

When monthly 2015 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-4.3%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 15.5 percent from levels reported in 2010.

Bar and line plot of FYMON

Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Prosecutions

The decrease from the levels five years ago in prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.

The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in May 2015 was for "Immigration", accounting for 55 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Withheld by Govt from TRAC (FOIA challen" (10.1%), " Drugs-Drug Trafficking" (9.9%), "Weapons-Operation Triggerlock Major" (4.8%), "Drugs-Organized Crime Task Force" (3.3%), "Other Criminal Prosecutions" (2.7%), "Assimilated Crimes" (2.1%). See Figure 2.

The lead investigative agency for prosecutions in May 2015 was DHS accounting for 62 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of referrals were: FBI (9% ), DEA (8%), ATF (6%), Defense (2%). See Figure 3.

Pie chart of progcatlabel

Figure 2. Specific Types of Prosecutions
Pie chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 3. Prosecutions by Investigative Agency

Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In May 2015, 7135 defendants in cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in May the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 43.2 percent of all magistrate filings in May.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (30.1%).

Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts

In May 2015, 4336 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during May there were an additional 1791 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during May.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of matters filed in U.S. District Court during May 2015.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,468 1 1 1 More
21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A 669 2 2 2 More
18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 491 3 4 4 More
21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 423 4 3 3 More
08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 223 5 5 5 More
21 USC 952 - Importation of controlled substances 98 6 7 8 More
18 USC 2252 - Material involving sexual exploitation of minors 83 7 6 7 More
18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 81 8 14 16 More
18 USC 641 - Public money, property or records 70 9 8 15 More
18 USC 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television 69 10 9 14 More
Table 2. Top Charges Filed

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841. "Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A" under Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922. "Firearms; Unlawful acts" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 922 was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 five years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in prosecutions — up 25.1 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 18 U.S.C Section 1951 that involves " Hobbs Act ". This was the same statute that had the largest increase — 53 % — when compared with five years ago.

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in prosecutions compared to one year ago — down 13.6 percent — was " Material involving sexual exploitation of minors " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 2252 ). Compared to five years ago, the most significant decline in prosecutions — 33.6 percent — was for filings where the lead charge was " Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A " (Title 21 U.S.C Section 841 ).

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

In May 2015 the Justice Department said the government brought 2342.5 prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.

Understandably, there is great variation in the per capita number of prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions per capita for these matters last month are shown in Table 3. Districts must have at least 5 prosecutions to receive a ranking.


Judicial District Percapita Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
N Mexico 18,545 322 1 4 5 More
Cal, S 12,777 357 2 5 4 More
Wyoming 10,822 52 3 71 72 More
Texas, W 9,990 549 4 2 2 More
Texas, S 7,924 588 5 1 1 More
S Dakota 7,769 54 6 37 46 More
W Virg, N 7,121 55 7 47 77 More
Arizona 6,594 360 8 3 3 More
Ala, S 6,043 42 9 69 69 More
Vermont 5,751 30 10 83 78 More
Table 3. Top 10 Districts (per ten million people)

  • The District of New Mexico — with 18545 prosecutions as compared with 2342.5 prosecutions per ten million population in the United States — was the most active during May 2015. The District of New Mexico was ranked 4 a year ago, while it was ranked 5 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • The Southern District of California (San Diego) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of California (San Diego) was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • District of Wyoming is now ranking 3rd.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were South Dakota , now ranked 6th , and Northern District of West Virginia (Wheeling) at 7th In the same order, these districts ranked 37th and 47th one year ago and 46th and 77th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in the rate of prosecutions compared to one year ago — 13.3 percent — was Vermont . Compared to five years ago, the district with the largest growth — 32.9 percent — was Northern District of West Virginia (Wheeling).

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in the rate of prosecutions — 14.8 percent — was Northern District of West Virginia (Wheeling).  But over the past five years, Western District of Texas (San Antonio) showed the largest drop — 34.1 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new crime cases of this type during May 2015 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Moses, Alia Texas, W 162 1 2 - More
Gonzales, Kenneth John N Mexico 146 2 3 - More
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 117 3 1 2 More
Hanen, Andrew S. Texas, S 77 4 5 13 More
Junell, Robert A. Texas, W 72 5 4 5 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 57 6 6 7 More
Ramos, Nelva Gonzales Texas, S 56 7 15 - More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 52 8 7 3 More
Cardone, Kathleen Texas, W 50 9 14 11 More
Briones, David Texas, W 47 10 12 9 More
Table 4. Top Ten Judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of filings per capit.

  • Judge Alia Moses in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 1st with 162 defendants in cases. Judge Moses also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 2).

  • Judge Kenneth John Gonzales in the District of New Mexico ranked 2nd with 146 defendants in cases. Judge Gonzales also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 3).

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 3rd with 117 defendants in cases. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 2).

Report Generated: June 24, 2015
TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2015, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page