Immigration Convictions for April 2014

Number Latest Month 8,196
Percent Change from previous month 22.8
Percent Change from 1 year ago -22.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Including Magistrate Court) -10.9
Percent Change from 5 years ago (Excluding Magistrate Court) -6.8
Table 1. Criminal Immigration Convictions

The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during April 2014 the government reported 8196 new immigration convictions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 22.8 percent over the previous month.

The comparisons of the number of defendants convicted for immigration-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).

When monthly 2014 convictions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of convictions was down (-22.9%). Convictions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that convictions of this type are down 10.9 percent from levels reported in 2009.

The dip in these cases is partly related to increases in the matters filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. If magistrate cases are excluded and only Federal District Court cases are counted, the overall decrease in immigration convictions is 6.8 percent instead of 10.9 percent. The evidence suggests that part of the difference may be the result of improvements in the recording of the magistrate cases by the Justice Department.

Bar and line plot of FYMON

Figure 1. Monthly Trends in Immigration Convictions

The decrease from the levels five years ago in immigration convictions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of immigration convictions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.

Pie chart of agenrevgrp

Figure 2. Convictions by Investigative Agency

Virtually all federal criminal convictions for immigration offenses in April 2014 (100 percent) were referred by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  The two lead investigative agencies in DHS are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) whose border patrol agencies guard the county's borders, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), responsible for conducting most immigration criminal  investigations under the immigration laws. See Figure 2.

Immigration Convictions in U.S. Magistrate Courts

Top Ranked Lead Charges

In April 2014, 5784 defendants in immigration cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.

In the magistrate courts in April the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 involving "Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc.". This was the lead charge for 71.2 percent of all magistrate convictions in April.

Other frequently prosecuted lead charges include: "08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien" (27.5%).

Immigration Convictions in U.S. District Courts

In April 2014, 2412 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during April there were an additional 0 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during April.

Top Ranked Lead Charges

Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the convictions of immigration matters filed in U.S. District Court during April 2014.

Lead Charge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
08 USC 1326 - Reentry of deported alien 1,950 1 1 1 More
08 USC 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens 222 2 2 2 More
18 USC 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents 111 3 3 3 More
18 USC 1544 - Misuse of passport 34 4 5 9 More
08 USC 1325 - Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. 24 5 4 4 More
18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 10 6 9 11 More
18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 10 6 8 7 More
18 USC 911 - False personification - Citizen of the US 6 8 6 6 More
18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 6 8 11 5 More
18 USC 1542 - False statement in application and use of passport 6 8 7 8 More
Table 2. Top Charges for Convictions

  • "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was the most frequent recorded lead charge. "Reentry of deported alien" (Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 five years ago.

  • Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324. "Bringing in and harboring certain aliens" under Title 8 U.S.C Section 1324 was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 five years ago.

  • Ranked 3rd was "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546. "Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1546 was ranked 3 a year ago, while it was ranked 3 five years ago.

Among these top ten lead charges, the one showing the greatest increase in convictions — up 30.1 percent — compared to one year ago was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1325 that involves " Entry of alien at improper time or place; etc. ". Compared to five years ago, the largest increase — 455.9 percent — was registered for convictions under " Misuse of passport " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 1544 ).

Again among the top ten lead charges, the one showing the sharpest decline in convictions compared to one year ago — down 76.3 percent — was " False personification - Citizen of the US " (Title 18 U.S.C Section 911 ). This was the same statute that had the largest decrease — 82.2 % — when compared with five years ago.

Top Ranked Judicial Districts

Understandably, there is great variation in the number of immigration convictions in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.

The districts registering the largest number of convictions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.


Judicial District Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Arizona 544 1 5 4 More
Texas, S 402 2 1 1 More
Texas, W 387 3 2 2 More
N Mexico 285 4 4 5 More
Cal, S 161 5 3 3 More
Fla, S 104 6 6 7 More
Mich, E 61 7 18 49 More
Colorado 29 8 13 17 More
Fla, M 28 9 10 9 More
Texas, N 20 10 12 15 More
Virg, E 20 10 11 13 More
Table 3. Top 10 Districts

  • The District of Arizona — with 544 convictions — was the most active during April 2014. The District of Arizona was ranked 5 a year ago, while it was ranked 4 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • The Southern District of Texas (Houston) ranked 2nd. The Southern District of Texas (Houston) was ranked 1 a year ago, while it was ranked 1 for most frequent use five years ago.

  • Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is now ranking 3rd. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) was ranked 2 a year ago, while it was ranked 2 for most frequent use five years ago.

Recent entrants to the top 10 list were Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria), now ranked 10th , and Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth) at 10th In the same order, these districts ranked 11th and 12th one year ago and 13th and 15th five years ago.

The federal judicial district which showed the greatest growth in immigration convictions compared to one year ago — 101.3 percent — was Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). This was the same district that had the largest increase — 694.7 percent — when compared with five years ago.

In the last year, the judicial District Court recording the largest drop in immigration convictions — 32.2 percent — was Southern District of California (San Diego).  But over the past five years, Middle District of Florida (Tampa) showed the largest drop — 43.9 percent.

Top Ranked District Judges

At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new immigration crime cases resulting in convictions of this type during April 2014 are shown in Table 4.

Judge Count Rank 1yr ago 5yrs ago  
Brack, Robert C. N Mexico 127 1 1 4 More
Gonzales, Kenneth John N Mexico 90 2 - - More
Moses, Alia Texas, W 90 2 2 - More
Bolton, Susan Ritchie Arizona 69 4 51 41 More
Hinojosa, Ricardo H. Texas, S 65 5 4 5 More
Snow, G. Murray Arizona 62 6 62 63 More
Campbell, David G. Arizona 56 7 53 49 More
Crane, Randy Texas, S 55 8 3 6 More
Wake, Neil Vincent Arizona 54 9 57 38 More
Alvarez, Micaela Texas, S 46 10 5 1 More
Table 4. Top Ten Judges

All 10 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of immigration convictions.

  • Judge Robert C. Brack in the District of New Mexico ranked 1st with 127 convicted in immigration convictions. Judge Brack appeared in the top ten rankings one year (ranked 1) and five years ago (rank 4).

  • Judges Kenneth John Gonzales in the District of New Mexico and Alia Moses in the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) ranked 2nd with 90 convicted in immigration convictions. Judge Moses also appeared in the top ten rankings one year ago (ranked 2).

Report Generated: July 3, 2014
TRAC Copyright
Copyright 2014, TRAC Reports, Inc.

TRAC RSS Feed for this page Email Feed for this page Email this page