Official Corruption Prosecutions for February 2018
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during February 2018 the government reported 32 new official corruption prosecutions. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is up 28 percent over the previous month.
The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with official corruption-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by TRAC under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1).
When monthly 2018 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down (-21.6%). Prosecutions over the past year are still much lower than they were five years ago. Overall, the data show that prosecutions of this type are down 45.2 percent from levels reported in 2013.
The decrease from the levels five years ago in official corruption prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of official corruption prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. Where a prosecution was initially filed in U.S. Magistrate Court and then transferred to the U.S. District Court, the magistrate filing date was used since this provides an earlier indicator of actual trends. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 and in the sections that follow are all based upon this six-month moving average. To view trends year-by-year rather than month-by-month, see TRAC's annual report series for a broader picture.
Within the broad category of official corruption, cases were classified by prosecutors into more specific types.
Case types within official corruption are
Federal Corruption - Procurement
Federal Corruption - Program
Federal Corruption - Law Enforcement
Federal Corruption - Other
State Corruption
Local Corruption
Other Public Corruption
The largest number of prosecutions of these matters in February 2018 was for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Other", accounting for 40.6 percent of prosecutions. Prosecutions were also filed for "Corruption(Govt Off)-Local" (28.1%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Other" (18.8%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-Fed Law Enforcement" (6.3%), "Corruption(Govt Off)-State" (6.3%). See Figure 2.
The lead investigative agency for official corruption prosecutions in February 2018 was FBI accounting for 50 percent of prosecutions referred. Other agencies with substantial numbers of official corruption referrals were: DHS (16% ), Justice Other (9%), IRS (6%), Postal (6%). See Figure 3.
Official Corruption Prosecutions in U.S. Magistrate Courts
Top Ranked Lead Charges
In February 2018, 1 defendants in official corruption cases for these matters were filed in U.S. Magistrate Courts. These courts handle less serious misdemeanor cases, including what are called "petty offenses." In addition, complaints are sometimes filed in the magistrate courts before an indictment or information is entered. In these cases, the matter starts in the magistrate courts and later moves to the district court where subsequent proceedings take place.
In the magistrate courts in February the most frequently cited lead charge was Title 8 U.S.C Section 1326 involving "Reentry of deported alien". This was the lead charge for 100 percent of all magistrate filings in February.
Official Corruption Prosecutions in U.S. District Courts
In February 2018, 31 defendants in new cases for these matters were charged in the U.S. District Courts. In addition during February there were an additional 4 defendants whose cases moved from the magistrate courts to the U.S. district courts after an indictment or information was filed. The sections which follow cover both sets of cases and therefore cover all matters filed in district court during February.
Top Ranked Lead Charges
Table 2 shows the top lead charges recorded in the prosecutions of official corruption matters filed in U.S. District Court during February 2018.
Lead Charge Count Rank 18 USC 666 - Theft or bribery in programs receiving Fed funds 9 1 More 18 USC 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television 5 2 More 18 USC 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses 4 3 More 18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 3 4 More 18 USC 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant 2 5 More 18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 2 5 More 18 USC 1001 - Fraud/false statements or entries generally 1 8 More 18 USC 1028 - Fraud and related activity - id documents 1 8 More 18 USC 1341 - Mail Fraud - Frauds and swindles 1 8 More 18 USC 1349 - Mail Fraud - Attempt and Conspiracy 1 8 More 18 USC 1709 - Theft of mail matter by officer or employee 1 8 More 18 USC 1791 - Providing or possessing contraband in prison 1 8 More 18 USC 1955 - Prohibition of illegal gambling businesses 1 8 More 18 USC 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments 1 8 More Table 2. Top Charges Filed
"Theft or bribery in programs receiving Fed funds" (Title 18 U.S.C Section 666) was the most frequent recorded lead charge.
Ranked 2nd in frequency was the lead charge "Fraud by wire, radio, or television" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1343.
Ranked 3rd was "Bribery of public officials and witnesses" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 201.
Top Ranked Judicial Districts
In February 2018 the Justice Department said the government brought 13 official corruption prosecutions for every ten million people in the United States.
Understandably, there is great variation in the number of official corruption prosecutions that are filed in each of the nation's ninety-four federal judicial districts.
The districts registering the largest number of prosecutions of this type last month are shown in Table 3.
Judicial District Count Rank N. Y., S 6 1 More D. C. 3 2 More Ken, W 3 2 More Montana 3 2 More N. J. 3 2 More N. Y., E 3 2 More Maryland 2 7 More Mo, W 2 7 More Arizona 1 9 More Cal, E 1 9 More Ga, N 1 9 More Kansas 1 9 More Mich, W 1 9 More Nevada 1 9 More Penn, E 1 9 More Penn, M 1 9 More Texas, S 1 9 More W Virg, S 1 9 More Table 3. Top 10 Districts
The Southern District of New York (Manhattan) — with 6 prosecutions — was the most active during February 2018.
The District of Washington, D.C. (Washington), Western District of Kentucky (Louisville), District of Montana, District of New Jersey and Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) ranked 2nd.
Top Ranked District Judges
At any one time, there are about 680 federal District Court judges working in the United States. The judges recorded with the largest number of new official corruption crime cases of this type during February 2018 are shown in Table 4.
Judge Count Rank Hale, David Jason Ken, W 3 1 More Morris, Brian Matthew Montana 3 1 More Wexler, Leonard D. N. Y., E 3 1 More Blake, Catherine C. Maryland 2 4 More Ferraro, D. Thomas Arizona 1 5 More Drozd, Dale A. Cal, E 1 5 More Moss, Randolph Daniel D. C. 1 5 More Batten, Timothy C., Sr. Ga, N 1 5 More Melgren, Eric F. Kansas 1 5 More Maloney, Paul Lewis Mich, W 1 5 More Linares, Jose L. N. J. 1 5 More Salas, Esther N. J. 1 5 More Vazquez, John Michael N. J. 1 5 More Pratter, Gene E.K. Penn, E 1 5 More Conner, Christopher C. Penn, M 1 5 More Crane, Randy Texas, S 1 5 More Table 4. Top Ten Judges
All 16 of the "top ten" judges were in districts which were in the top ten with the largest number of official corruption filings. (Because of ties, there were a total of 16 judges in the "top ten" rankings.)
Judges David Jason Hale in the Western District of Kentucky (Louisville), Brian Matthew Morris in the District of Montana and Leonard D. Wexler in the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) ranked 1st with 3 defendants in official corruption cases.
Report Generated: March 26, 2018
