Percent of IRS Criminal Referrals That Are Declined 2009
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Prosecuted# DeclinedPercentRank
U.S. 1,280 1,242 49.2 -
Ala, N Birmingham 10 11 52.4 33
Ala, M Montgomery 3 0 0.0 87
Ala, S Mobile 1 8 88.9 5
Alaska Anchorage 3 0 0.0 87
Arizona Phoenix 17 23 57.5 25
Ark, E Little Rock 1 6 85.7 8
Ark, W Fort Smith 7 10 58.8 23
Cal, N San Francisco 19 22 53.7 32
Cal, C Los Angeles 78 82 51.3 34
Cal, E Sacramento 55 42 43.3 44
Cal, S San Diego 12 10 45.5 43
Colorado Denver 22 22 50.0 37
Conn New Haven 26 27 50.9 35
Delaware Wilmington 10 5 33.3 66
D. C. Washington 4 3 42.9 45
Fla, N Pensacola 7 10 58.8 23
Fla, M Tampa 39 40 50.6 36
Fla, S Miami 50 29 36.7 61
Ga, N Atlanta 23 5 17.9 83
Ga, M Macon 6 14 70.0 10
Ga, S Savannah 9 6 40.0 52
Hawaii Honolulu 3 2 40.0 52
Idaho Boise 9 0 0.0 87
Ill, N Chicago 39 33 45.8 42
Ill, S East St. Louis 13 9 40.9 51
Ill, C Springfield 8 1 11.1 86
Ind, N South Bend 3 4 57.1 26
Ind, S Indianapolis 16 21 56.8 29
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 1 7 87.5 6
Iowa, S Des Moines 3 7 70.0 10
Kansas Topeka 36 10 21.7 81
Ken, E Lexington 1 12 92.3 4
Ken, W Louisville 12 81 87.1 7
La, E New Orleans 5 1 16.7 85
La, M Baton Rouge 2 3 60.0 19
La, W Shreveport 6 13 68.4 12
Maine Portland 0 5 100.0 1
Maryland Baltimore 22 9 29.0 72
Mass Boston 30 17 36.2 64
Mich, E Detroit 26 16 38.1 58
Mich, W Grand Rapids 5 2 28.6 73
MinnesotaMinneapolis 19 14 42.4 49
Miss, N Oxford 9 5 35.7 65
Miss, S Jackson 12 15 55.6 30
Mo, E St. Louis 10 17 63.0 17
Mo, W Kansas City 17 12 41.4 50
Montana Billings 2 4 66.7 14
Nebraska Omaha 3 2 40.0 52
Nevada Las Vegas 24 18 42.9 45
New Hamp Concord 2 3 60.0 19
N. J. Newark 38 16 29.6 71
N Mexico Albuquerque 6 2 25.0 74
N. Y., N Syracuse 8 6 42.9 45
N. Y., E Brooklyn 30 10 25.0 74
N. Y., S Manhattan 32 15 31.9 69
N. Y., W Buffalo 20 17 45.9 41
N Car, E Raleigh 18 12 40.0 52
N Car, M Greensboro 4 7 63.6 16
N Car, W Asheville 12 15 55.6 30
N Dakota Fargo 2 3 60.0 19
Ohio, N Cleveland 20 12 37.5 60
Ohio, S Cincinnati 31 18 36.7 61
Okla, N Tulsa 6 9 60.0 19
Okla, E Muskogee 0 1 100.0 1
Okla, W Oklahoma City 9 3 25.0 74
Oregon Portland 23 17 42.5 48
Penn, E Philadelphia 9 6 40.0 52
Penn, M Scranton 10 3 23.1 80
Penn, W Pittsburgh 29 18 38.3 57
R. I. Providence 3 1 25.0 74
S Car Columbia 16 5 23.8 79
S Dakota Sioux Falls 2 1 33.3 66
Tenn, E Knoxville 11 3 21.4 82
Tenn, M Nashville 6 6 50.0 37
Tenn, W Memphis 6 2 25.0 74
Texas, N Fort Worth 23 49 68.1 13
Texas, E Tyler 36 16 30.8 70
Texas, S Houston 23 14 37.8 59
Texas, W San Antonio 27 36 57.1 26
Utah Salt Lake City 14 3 17.6 84
Vermont Burlington 0 0 - -
Virg, E Alexandria 15 24 61.5 18
Virg, W Roanoke 6 8 57.1 26
Wash, E Spokane 0 7 100.0 1
Wash, W Seattle 10 20 66.7 14
W Virg, NWheeling 7 7 50.0 37
W Virg, SCharleston 9 52 85.2 9
Wisc, E Milwaukee 7 4 36.4 63
Wisc, W Madison 4 2 33.3 66
Wyoming Cheyenne 1 1 50.0 37


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2010