Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2007
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 14,355 9,968 8,897 62.0 -
Kansas Topeka 166 154 146 88.0 1
MinnesotaMinneapolis 87 76 74 85.1 2
Cal, E Sacramento 101 90 85 84.2 3
Wyoming Cheyenne 105 90 86 81.9 4
N Car, W Asheville 273 240 223 81.7 5
N Car, M Greensboro 188 157 152 80.9 6
Texas, E Tyler 328 280 264 80.5 7
Virg, W Roanoke 311 260 247 79.4 8
Mich, W Grand Rapids 128 107 101 78.9 9
Ohio, S Cincinnati 208 185 164 78.8 10
Penn, M Scranton 84 67 66 78.6 11
S Car Columbia 393 327 304 77.4 12
Wash, W Seattle 115 95 89 77.4 12
Okla, W Oklahoma City 70 60 54 77.1 14
Ala, N Birmingham 206 176 158 76.7 15
N Car, E Raleigh 232 188 175 75.4 16
Ken, E Lexington 217 181 163 75.1 17
N. Y., E Brooklyn 95 82 71 74.7 18
Hawaii Honolulu 59 46 44 74.6 19
Cal, N San Francisco 97 74 72 74.2 20
Ind, N South Bend 194 157 143 73.7 21
Ala, M Montgomery 106 83 78 73.6 22
Ala, S Mobile 94 75 69 73.4 23
Ill, C Springfield 74 54 54 73.0 24
Nebraska Omaha 72 57 51 70.8 25
Oregon Portland 96 74 68 70.8 25
New Hamp Concord 44 36 31 70.5 27
Cal, C Los Angeles 134 110 94 70.1 28
Virg, E Alexandria 495 385 347 70.1 28
N Mexico Albuquerque 113 83 79 69.9 30
Mo, W Kansas City 398 293 278 69.8 31
N. J. Newark 134 98 93 69.4 32
Texas, W San Antonio 215 166 148 68.8 33
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 123 89 83 67.5 34
Wash, E Spokane 120 98 79 65.8 35
Mich, E Detroit 197 164 129 65.5 36
Fla, S Miami 317 226 205 64.7 37
Mo, E St. Louis 255 175 164 64.3 38
Conn New Haven 64 47 41 64.1 39
La, E New Orleans 112 74 71 63.4 40
Miss, N Oxford 41 29 26 63.4 40
Penn, W Pittsburgh 147 104 93 63.3 42
Wisc, W Madison 29 20 18 62.1 43
Ark, E Little Rock 120 91 74 61.7 44
R. I. Providence 36 23 22 61.1 45
Iowa, S Des Moines 123 83 75 61.0 46
Tenn, M Nashville 107 76 65 60.7 47
Mass Boston 111 78 67 60.4 48
N. Y., S Manhattan 112 78 67 59.8 49
N. Y., N Syracuse 106 77 63 59.4 50
La, W Shreveport 120 77 71 59.2 51
Ill, N Chicago 164 102 97 59.1 52
Texas, S Houston 332 219 193 58.1 53
N. Y., W Buffalo 221 139 128 57.9 54
Ga, M Macon 90 62 52 57.8 55
Vermont Burlington 64 40 37 57.8 55
Ohio, N Cleveland 230 160 132 57.4 57
Cal, S San Diego 23 23 13 56.5 58
Fla, N Pensacola 85 50 48 56.5 58
Fla, M Tampa 282 175 159 56.4 60
Maryland Baltimore 245 155 138 56.3 61
Ga, S Savannah 188 123 105 55.9 62
Texas, N Fort Worth 353 223 197 55.8 63
Arizona Phoenix 260 170 142 54.6 64
Ill, S East St. Louis 97 59 53 54.6 64
Miss, S Jackson 122 94 66 54.1 66
S Dakota Sioux Falls 52 34 28 53.8 67
Delaware Wilmington 47 31 25 53.2 68
W Virg, NWheeling 77 48 41 53.2 68
Tenn, E Knoxville 258 161 137 53.1 70
Okla, N Tulsa 173 97 90 52.0 71
Colorado Denver 125 75 64 51.2 72
Ken, W Louisville 158 91 80 50.6 73
Alaska Anchorage 42 22 21 50.0 74
N Dakota Fargo 80 46 40 50.0 74
Tenn, W Memphis 287 168 140 48.8 76
Ind, S Indianapolis 60 34 29 48.3 77
Ark, W Fort Smith 25 15 12 48.0 78
Ga, N Atlanta 263 163 126 47.9 79
Montana Billings 137 81 65 47.4 80
Wisc, E Milwaukee 127 68 60 47.2 81
Idaho Boise 90 44 42 46.7 82
Utah Salt Lake City 340 177 155 45.6 83
Penn, E Philadelphia 289 142 131 45.3 84
La, M Baton Rouge 109 66 45 41.3 85
W Virg, SCharleston 57 22 21 36.8 86
Okla, E Muskogee 50 17 16 32.0 87
D. C. Washington 34 13 10 29.4 88
Maine Portland 213 64 59 27.7 89
Nevada Las Vegas 470 168 120 25.5 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009