Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2007
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 14,355 9,968 8,897 62.0 -
Ala, N Birmingham 206 176 158 76.7 15
Ala, M Montgomery 106 83 78 73.6 22
Ala, S Mobile 94 75 69 73.4 23
Alaska Anchorage 42 22 21 50.0 74
Arizona Phoenix 260 170 142 54.6 64
Ark, E Little Rock 120 91 74 61.7 44
Ark, W Fort Smith 25 15 12 48.0 78
Cal, N San Francisco 97 74 72 74.2 20
Cal, C Los Angeles 134 110 94 70.1 28
Cal, E Sacramento 101 90 85 84.2 3
Cal, S San Diego 23 23 13 56.5 58
Colorado Denver 125 75 64 51.2 72
Conn New Haven 64 47 41 64.1 39
Delaware Wilmington 47 31 25 53.2 68
D. C. Washington 34 13 10 29.4 88
Fla, N Pensacola 85 50 48 56.5 58
Fla, M Tampa 282 175 159 56.4 60
Fla, S Miami 317 226 205 64.7 37
Ga, N Atlanta 263 163 126 47.9 79
Ga, M Macon 90 62 52 57.8 55
Ga, S Savannah 188 123 105 55.9 62
Hawaii Honolulu 59 46 44 74.6 19
Idaho Boise 90 44 42 46.7 82
Ill, N Chicago 164 102 97 59.1 52
Ill, S East St. Louis 97 59 53 54.6 64
Ill, C Springfield 74 54 54 73.0 24
Ind, N South Bend 194 157 143 73.7 21
Ind, S Indianapolis 60 34 29 48.3 77
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 123 89 83 67.5 34
Iowa, S Des Moines 123 83 75 61.0 46
Kansas Topeka 166 154 146 88.0 1
Ken, E Lexington 217 181 163 75.1 17
Ken, W Louisville 158 91 80 50.6 73
La, E New Orleans 112 74 71 63.4 40
La, M Baton Rouge 109 66 45 41.3 85
La, W Shreveport 120 77 71 59.2 51
Maine Portland 213 64 59 27.7 89
Maryland Baltimore 245 155 138 56.3 61
Mass Boston 111 78 67 60.4 48
Mich, E Detroit 197 164 129 65.5 36
Mich, W Grand Rapids 128 107 101 78.9 9
MinnesotaMinneapolis 87 76 74 85.1 2
Miss, N Oxford 41 29 26 63.4 40
Miss, S Jackson 122 94 66 54.1 66
Mo, E St. Louis 255 175 164 64.3 38
Mo, W Kansas City 398 293 278 69.8 31
Montana Billings 137 81 65 47.4 80
Nebraska Omaha 72 57 51 70.8 25
Nevada Las Vegas 470 168 120 25.5 90
New Hamp Concord 44 36 31 70.5 27
N. J. Newark 134 98 93 69.4 32
N Mexico Albuquerque 113 83 79 69.9 30
N. Y., N Syracuse 106 77 63 59.4 50
N. Y., E Brooklyn 95 82 71 74.7 18
N. Y., S Manhattan 112 78 67 59.8 49
N. Y., W Buffalo 221 139 128 57.9 54
N Car, E Raleigh 232 188 175 75.4 16
N Car, M Greensboro 188 157 152 80.9 6
N Car, W Asheville 273 240 223 81.7 5
N Dakota Fargo 80 46 40 50.0 74
Ohio, N Cleveland 230 160 132 57.4 57
Ohio, S Cincinnati 208 185 164 78.8 10
Okla, N Tulsa 173 97 90 52.0 71
Okla, E Muskogee 50 17 16 32.0 87
Okla, W Oklahoma City 70 60 54 77.1 14
Oregon Portland 96 74 68 70.8 25
Penn, E Philadelphia 289 142 131 45.3 84
Penn, M Scranton 84 67 66 78.6 11
Penn, W Pittsburgh 147 104 93 63.3 42
R. I. Providence 36 23 22 61.1 45
S Car Columbia 393 327 304 77.4 12
S Dakota Sioux Falls 52 34 28 53.8 67
Tenn, E Knoxville 258 161 137 53.1 70
Tenn, M Nashville 107 76 65 60.7 47
Tenn, W Memphis 287 168 140 48.8 76
Texas, N Fort Worth 353 223 197 55.8 63
Texas, E Tyler 328 280 264 80.5 7
Texas, S Houston 332 219 193 58.1 53
Texas, W San Antonio 215 166 148 68.8 33
Utah Salt Lake City 340 177 155 45.6 83
Vermont Burlington 64 40 37 57.8 55
Virg, E Alexandria 495 385 347 70.1 28
Virg, W Roanoke 311 260 247 79.4 8
Wash, E Spokane 120 98 79 65.8 35
Wash, W Seattle 115 95 89 77.4 12
W Virg, NWheeling 77 48 41 53.2 68
W Virg, SCharleston 57 22 21 36.8 86
Wisc, E Milwaukee 127 68 60 47.2 81
Wisc, W Madison 29 20 18 62.1 43
Wyoming Cheyenne 105 90 86 81.9 4


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009