Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2006
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of		# Prosecutions
Completed		# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted		Rank
U.S. 16,217 10,384 9,262 57.1 -
MinnesotaMinneapolis 74 66 64 86.5 1
Hawaii Honolulu 94 80 76 80.9 2
N Car, M Greensboro 186 156 150 80.6 3
Ohio, S Cincinnati 238 205 190 79.8 4
N Car, W Asheville 232 202 183 78.9 5
Wyoming Cheyenne 90 77 71 78.9 5
Ala, N Birmingham 265 221 205 77.4 7
Kansas Topeka 148 125 114 77.0 8
Virg, W Roanoke 288 241 220 76.4 9
Texas, E Tyler 366 305 279 76.2 10
Ala, S Mobile 99 79 75 75.8 11
Ill, C Springfield 57 44 43 75.4 12
Virg, E Alexandria 511 415 378 74.0 13
Nebraska Omaha 84 66 62 73.8 14
Ohio, N Cleveland 241 187 177 73.4 15
Ind, N South Bend 227 180 166 73.1 16
Cal, E Sacramento 89 78 65 73.0 17
Wash, W Seattle 129 106 94 72.9 18
N Car, E Raleigh 312 237 224 71.8 19
Mich, W Grand Rapids 162 125 116 71.6 20
S Car Columbia 396 303 282 71.2 21
Texas, S Houston 401 315 285 71.1 22
Ala, M Montgomery 90 73 63 70.0 23
Mo, W Kansas City 405 300 282 69.6 24
Penn, M Scranton 94 72 65 69.1 25
Mass Boston 119 92 82 68.9 26
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 73 56 50 68.5 27
N. Y., E Brooklyn 98 77 67 68.4 28
Ark, E Little Rock 116 89 79 68.1 29
N. J. Newark 123 87 83 67.5 30
Okla, N Tulsa 167 120 112 67.1 31
W Virg, NWheeling 94 78 63 67.0 32
N Dakota Fargo 73 48 48 65.8 33
Texas, W San Antonio 203 148 133 65.5 34
La, W Shreveport 137 95 89 65.0 35
Oregon Portland 123 87 80 65.0 35
Ken, W Louisville 152 103 96 63.2 37
Vermont Burlington 78 51 49 62.8 38
Miss, S Jackson 107 88 67 62.6 39
Okla, E Muskogee 23 15 14 60.9 40
Tenn, W Memphis 238 163 145 60.9 40
Ill, S East St. Louis 89 59 54 60.7 42
Tenn, E Knoxville 272 180 165 60.7 42
Fla, N Pensacola 99 65 60 60.6 44
Colorado Denver 177 124 107 60.5 45
Cal, N San Francisco 149 103 90 60.4 46
Mich, E Detroit 235 194 142 60.4 46
La, E New Orleans 116 72 70 60.3 48
Montana Billings 103 77 62 60.2 49
R. I. Providence 50 30 30 60.0 50
Mo, E St. Louis 370 236 221 59.7 51
Okla, W Oklahoma City 51 40 30 58.8 52
Delaware Wilmington 40 27 23 57.5 53
Ken, E Lexington 197 136 113 57.4 54
S Dakota Sioux Falls 58 36 33 56.9 55
Fla, M Tampa 292 175 166 56.8 56
New Hamp Concord 30 20 17 56.7 57
N. Y., W Buffalo 239 148 135 56.5 58
Wisc, E Milwaukee 117 74 66 56.4 59
N Mexico Albuquerque 158 102 88 55.7 60
La, M Baton Rouge 125 90 69 55.2 61
N. Y., N Syracuse 82 53 45 54.9 62
Ga, M Macon 104 63 57 54.8 63
Maryland Baltimore 316 190 171 54.1 64
N. Y., S Manhattan 102 78 55 53.9 65
Penn, W Pittsburgh 160 98 86 53.8 66
Fla, S Miami 294 188 158 53.7 67
Iowa, S Des Moines 123 74 66 53.7 67
Ga, N Atlanta 245 164 130 53.1 69
Ill, N Chicago 182 109 94 51.6 70
Ga, S Savannah 179 115 91 50.8 71
Arizona Phoenix 144 94 73 50.7 72
Conn New Haven 71 37 36 50.7 72
Texas, N Fort Worth 407 236 205 50.4 74
Ind, S Indianapolis 79 51 38 48.1 75
D. C. Washington 25 13 12 48.0 76
Wash, E Spokane 134 87 64 47.8 77
Wisc, W Madison 34 18 16 47.1 78
Alaska Anchorage 50 26 23 46.0 79
Ark, W Fort Smith 60 31 27 45.0 80
Utah Salt Lake City 413 198 177 42.9 81
Cal, C Los Angeles 260 139 110 42.3 82
Miss, N Oxford 81 34 30 37.0 83
Tenn, M Nashville 163 67 59 36.2 84
W Virg, SCharleston 60 24 21 35.0 85
Maine Portland 161 62 51 31.7 86
Idaho Boise 128 38 35 27.3 87
Cal, S San Diego 19 8 5 26.3 88
Nevada Las Vegas 402 104 93 23.1 89
Penn, E Philadelphia 1,431 261 241 16.8 90

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009