Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2006
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 16,217 10,384 9,262 57.1 -
Ala, N Birmingham 265 221 205 77.4 7
Ala, M Montgomery 90 73 63 70.0 23
Ala, S Mobile 99 79 75 75.8 11
Alaska Anchorage 50 26 23 46.0 79
Arizona Phoenix 144 94 73 50.7 72
Ark, E Little Rock 116 89 79 68.1 29
Ark, W Fort Smith 60 31 27 45.0 80
Cal, N San Francisco 149 103 90 60.4 46
Cal, C Los Angeles 260 139 110 42.3 82
Cal, E Sacramento 89 78 65 73.0 17
Cal, S San Diego 19 8 5 26.3 88
Colorado Denver 177 124 107 60.5 45
Conn New Haven 71 37 36 50.7 72
Delaware Wilmington 40 27 23 57.5 53
D. C. Washington 25 13 12 48.0 76
Fla, N Pensacola 99 65 60 60.6 44
Fla, M Tampa 292 175 166 56.8 56
Fla, S Miami 294 188 158 53.7 67
Ga, N Atlanta 245 164 130 53.1 69
Ga, M Macon 104 63 57 54.8 63
Ga, S Savannah 179 115 91 50.8 71
Hawaii Honolulu 94 80 76 80.9 2
Idaho Boise 128 38 35 27.3 87
Ill, N Chicago 182 109 94 51.6 70
Ill, S East St. Louis 89 59 54 60.7 42
Ill, C Springfield 57 44 43 75.4 12
Ind, N South Bend 227 180 166 73.1 16
Ind, S Indianapolis 79 51 38 48.1 75
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 73 56 50 68.5 27
Iowa, S Des Moines 123 74 66 53.7 67
Kansas Topeka 148 125 114 77.0 8
Ken, E Lexington 197 136 113 57.4 54
Ken, W Louisville 152 103 96 63.2 37
La, E New Orleans 116 72 70 60.3 48
La, M Baton Rouge 125 90 69 55.2 61
La, W Shreveport 137 95 89 65.0 35
Maine Portland 161 62 51 31.7 86
Maryland Baltimore 316 190 171 54.1 64
Mass Boston 119 92 82 68.9 26
Mich, E Detroit 235 194 142 60.4 46
Mich, W Grand Rapids 162 125 116 71.6 20
MinnesotaMinneapolis 74 66 64 86.5 1
Miss, N Oxford 81 34 30 37.0 83
Miss, S Jackson 107 88 67 62.6 39
Mo, E St. Louis 370 236 221 59.7 51
Mo, W Kansas City 405 300 282 69.6 24
Montana Billings 103 77 62 60.2 49
Nebraska Omaha 84 66 62 73.8 14
Nevada Las Vegas 402 104 93 23.1 89
New Hamp Concord 30 20 17 56.7 57
N. J. Newark 123 87 83 67.5 30
N Mexico Albuquerque 158 102 88 55.7 60
N. Y., N Syracuse 82 53 45 54.9 62
N. Y., E Brooklyn 98 77 67 68.4 28
N. Y., S Manhattan 102 78 55 53.9 65
N. Y., W Buffalo 239 148 135 56.5 58
N Car, E Raleigh 312 237 224 71.8 19
N Car, M Greensboro 186 156 150 80.6 3
N Car, W Asheville 232 202 183 78.9 5
N Dakota Fargo 73 48 48 65.8 33
Ohio, N Cleveland 241 187 177 73.4 15
Ohio, S Cincinnati 238 205 190 79.8 4
Okla, N Tulsa 167 120 112 67.1 31
Okla, E Muskogee 23 15 14 60.9 40
Okla, W Oklahoma City 51 40 30 58.8 52
Oregon Portland 123 87 80 65.0 35
Penn, E Philadelphia 1,431 261 241 16.8 90
Penn, M Scranton 94 72 65 69.1 25
Penn, W Pittsburgh 160 98 86 53.8 66
R. I. Providence 50 30 30 60.0 50
S Car Columbia 396 303 282 71.2 21
S Dakota Sioux Falls 58 36 33 56.9 55
Tenn, E Knoxville 272 180 165 60.7 42
Tenn, M Nashville 163 67 59 36.2 84
Tenn, W Memphis 238 163 145 60.9 40
Texas, N Fort Worth 407 236 205 50.4 74
Texas, E Tyler 366 305 279 76.2 10
Texas, S Houston 401 315 285 71.1 22
Texas, W San Antonio 203 148 133 65.5 34
Utah Salt Lake City 413 198 177 42.9 81
Vermont Burlington 78 51 49 62.8 38
Virg, E Alexandria 511 415 378 74.0 13
Virg, W Roanoke 288 241 220 76.4 9
Wash, E Spokane 134 87 64 47.8 77
Wash, W Seattle 129 106 94 72.9 18
W Virg, NWheeling 94 78 63 67.0 32
W Virg, SCharleston 60 24 21 35.0 85
Wisc, E Milwaukee 117 74 66 56.4 59
Wisc, W Madison 34 18 16 47.1 78
Wyoming Cheyenne 90 77 71 78.9 5


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009