Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2004
Districts in Rank Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 15,895 9,097 7,945 50.0 -
Virg, W Roanoke 217 191 170 78.3 1
Penn, M Scranton 71 62 55 77.5 2
Wyoming Cheyenne 88 70 67 76.1 3
Ala, N Birmingham 236 196 177 75.0 4
Texas, W San Antonio 163 133 122 74.8 5
MinnesotaMinneapolis 71 56 53 74.6 6
Virg, E Alexandria 421 354 312 74.1 7
S Car Columbia 347 269 253 72.9 8
N. Y., E Brooklyn 136 123 98 72.1 9
Kansas Topeka 154 128 110 71.4 10
Texas, E Tyler 196 148 140 71.4 10
Mo, E St. Louis 346 267 246 71.1 12
La, W Shreveport 124 99 88 71.0 13
Oregon Portland 195 154 138 70.8 14
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 51 44 36 70.6 15
La, E New Orleans 102 76 72 70.6 15
Tenn, E Knoxville 165 124 115 69.7 17
Vermont Burlington 64 46 43 67.2 18
Ala, M Montgomery 75 58 50 66.7 19
Mo, W Kansas City 411 293 274 66.7 19
Nebraska Omaha 139 103 92 66.2 21
Wash, W Seattle 62 45 41 66.1 22
New Hamp Concord 20 16 13 65.0 23
N Car, W Asheville 151 112 98 64.9 24
N Car, M Greensboro 200 135 129 64.5 25
Okla, W Oklahoma City 84 62 54 64.3 26
Hawaii Honolulu 86 65 55 64.0 27
N Car, E Raleigh 326 223 208 63.8 28
Tenn, W Memphis 220 162 139 63.2 29
Texas, S Houston 234 168 148 63.2 29
N. Y., S Manhattan 160 114 101 63.1 31
Ill, N Chicago 128 94 80 62.5 32
Colorado Denver 190 142 117 61.6 33
Ga, N Atlanta 186 147 114 61.3 34
Wisc, E Milwaukee 69 43 42 60.9 35
Texas, N Fort Worth 301 209 181 60.1 36
Fla, N Pensacola 155 98 93 60.0 37
Mich, E Detroit 281 232 166 59.1 38
Okla, E Muskogee 51 42 30 58.8 39
Miss, S Jackson 109 78 64 58.7 40
Arizona Phoenix 145 108 85 58.6 41
Ill, C Springfield 52 33 30 57.7 42
Ga, M Macon 61 42 35 57.4 43
Ind, S Indianapolis 94 69 54 57.4 43
Maryland Baltimore 247 159 139 56.3 45
Delaware Wilmington 57 38 32 56.1 46
N Mexico Albuquerque 123 78 69 56.1 46
N. Y., N Syracuse 70 44 39 55.7 48
N Dakota Fargo 72 43 40 55.6 49
N. J. Newark 116 73 64 55.2 50
Ohio, S Cincinnati 145 95 79 54.5 51
Ill, S East St. Louis 90 51 49 54.4 52
Fla, M Tampa 275 161 146 53.1 53
Ken, W Louisville 147 91 78 53.1 53
Tenn, M Nashville 85 54 45 52.9 55
Cal, E Sacramento 91 57 48 52.7 56
Alaska Anchorage 59 39 31 52.5 57
Iowa, S Des Moines 94 56 49 52.1 58
Ark, E Little Rock 98 63 51 52.0 59
Ark, W Fort Smith 29 17 15 51.7 60
Montana Billings 131 84 67 51.1 61
Cal, N San Francisco 183 111 93 50.8 62
Ind, N South Bend 195 113 99 50.8 62
Miss, N Oxford 71 40 36 50.7 64
Mich, W Grand Rapids 121 69 61 50.4 65
Fla, S Miami 267 152 134 50.2 66
S Dakota Sioux Falls 38 22 19 50.0 67
La, M Baton Rouge 108 70 53 49.1 68
Ga, S Savannah 105 68 50 47.6 69
Wisc, W Madison 59 29 28 47.5 70
Utah Salt Lake City 521 281 241 46.3 71
Ala, S Mobile 171 82 78 45.6 72
Cal, S San Diego 22 18 10 45.5 73
Okla, N Tulsa 121 61 53 43.8 74
W Virg, NWheeling 96 47 42 43.8 74
Ohio, N Cleveland 280 130 122 43.6 76
N. Y., W Buffalo 284 132 119 41.9 77
Ken, E Lexington 269 127 112 41.6 78
Conn New Haven 95 40 36 37.9 79
Penn, W Pittsburgh 59 23 22 37.3 80
Cal, C Los Angeles 172 103 63 36.6 81
Wash, E Spokane 181 74 58 32.0 82
Idaho Boise 140 47 42 30.0 83
Maine Portland 164 55 49 29.9 84
W Virg, SCharleston 102 31 28 27.5 85
Nevada Las Vegas 523 165 135 25.8 86
D. C. Washington 24 7 6 25.0 87
R. I. Providence 194 42 40 20.6 88
Penn, E Philadelphia 1,540 200 186 12.1 89
Mass Boston 630 75 64 10.2 90


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009