Percent of ATF Criminal Referrals Resulting in Finding of Guilt 2004
Districts in Alphabetical Order


(Click on District Name for Detailed Data)
DistrictCity# Referrals
Disposed of
# Prosecutions
Completed
# ConvictedPercent of
Referrals Convicted
Rank
U.S. 15,895 9,097 7,945 50.0 -
Ala, N Birmingham 236 196 177 75.0 4
Ala, M Montgomery 75 58 50 66.7 19
Ala, S Mobile 171 82 78 45.6 72
Alaska Anchorage 59 39 31 52.5 57
Arizona Phoenix 145 108 85 58.6 41
Ark, E Little Rock 98 63 51 52.0 59
Ark, W Fort Smith 29 17 15 51.7 60
Cal, N San Francisco 183 111 93 50.8 62
Cal, C Los Angeles 172 103 63 36.6 81
Cal, E Sacramento 91 57 48 52.7 56
Cal, S San Diego 22 18 10 45.5 73
Colorado Denver 190 142 117 61.6 33
Conn New Haven 95 40 36 37.9 79
Delaware Wilmington 57 38 32 56.1 46
D. C. Washington 24 7 6 25.0 87
Fla, N Pensacola 155 98 93 60.0 37
Fla, M Tampa 275 161 146 53.1 53
Fla, S Miami 267 152 134 50.2 66
Ga, N Atlanta 186 147 114 61.3 34
Ga, M Macon 61 42 35 57.4 43
Ga, S Savannah 105 68 50 47.6 69
Hawaii Honolulu 86 65 55 64.0 27
Idaho Boise 140 47 42 30.0 83
Ill, N Chicago 128 94 80 62.5 32
Ill, S East St. Louis 90 51 49 54.4 52
Ill, C Springfield 52 33 30 57.7 42
Ind, N South Bend 195 113 99 50.8 62
Ind, S Indianapolis 94 69 54 57.4 43
Iowa, N Cedar Rapids 51 44 36 70.6 15
Iowa, S Des Moines 94 56 49 52.1 58
Kansas Topeka 154 128 110 71.4 10
Ken, E Lexington 269 127 112 41.6 78
Ken, W Louisville 147 91 78 53.1 53
La, E New Orleans 102 76 72 70.6 15
La, M Baton Rouge 108 70 53 49.1 68
La, W Shreveport 124 99 88 71.0 13
Maine Portland 164 55 49 29.9 84
Maryland Baltimore 247 159 139 56.3 45
Mass Boston 630 75 64 10.2 90
Mich, E Detroit 281 232 166 59.1 38
Mich, W Grand Rapids 121 69 61 50.4 65
MinnesotaMinneapolis 71 56 53 74.6 6
Miss, N Oxford 71 40 36 50.7 64
Miss, S Jackson 109 78 64 58.7 40
Mo, E St. Louis 346 267 246 71.1 12
Mo, W Kansas City 411 293 274 66.7 19
Montana Billings 131 84 67 51.1 61
Nebraska Omaha 139 103 92 66.2 21
Nevada Las Vegas 523 165 135 25.8 86
New Hamp Concord 20 16 13 65.0 23
N. J. Newark 116 73 64 55.2 50
N Mexico Albuquerque 123 78 69 56.1 46
N. Y., N Syracuse 70 44 39 55.7 48
N. Y., E Brooklyn 136 123 98 72.1 9
N. Y., S Manhattan 160 114 101 63.1 31
N. Y., W Buffalo 284 132 119 41.9 77
N Car, E Raleigh 326 223 208 63.8 28
N Car, M Greensboro 200 135 129 64.5 25
N Car, W Asheville 151 112 98 64.9 24
N Dakota Fargo 72 43 40 55.6 49
Ohio, N Cleveland 280 130 122 43.6 76
Ohio, S Cincinnati 145 95 79 54.5 51
Okla, N Tulsa 121 61 53 43.8 74
Okla, E Muskogee 51 42 30 58.8 39
Okla, W Oklahoma City 84 62 54 64.3 26
Oregon Portland 195 154 138 70.8 14
Penn, E Philadelphia 1,540 200 186 12.1 89
Penn, M Scranton 71 62 55 77.5 2
Penn, W Pittsburgh 59 23 22 37.3 80
R. I. Providence 194 42 40 20.6 88
S Car Columbia 347 269 253 72.9 8
S Dakota Sioux Falls 38 22 19 50.0 67
Tenn, E Knoxville 165 124 115 69.7 17
Tenn, M Nashville 85 54 45 52.9 55
Tenn, W Memphis 220 162 139 63.2 29
Texas, N Fort Worth 301 209 181 60.1 36
Texas, E Tyler 196 148 140 71.4 10
Texas, S Houston 234 168 148 63.2 29
Texas, W San Antonio 163 133 122 74.8 5
Utah Salt Lake City 521 281 241 46.3 71
Vermont Burlington 64 46 43 67.2 18
Virg, E Alexandria 421 354 312 74.1 7
Virg, W Roanoke 217 191 170 78.3 1
Wash, E Spokane 181 74 58 32.0 82
Wash, W Seattle 62 45 41 66.1 22
W Virg, NWheeling 96 47 42 43.8 74
W Virg, SCharleston 102 31 28 27.5 85
Wisc, E Milwaukee 69 43 42 60.9 35
Wisc, W Madison 59 29 28 47.5 70
Wyoming Cheyenne 88 70 67 76.1 3


Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University
Copyright 2009